a dallas adventure - the future of alpha

just had the opportunity to spend a couple of days with levi fuson in dallas and it was a complete blast - i love this guy. we had the chance to bring an emerging church perspective to bear as some alpha folks were doing some strategic planning for alpha's future. there are over 24,000 alpha courses running in over 130 countries. Over 1.3 million people folks in the United States have taken the course and it's currently in 7,200 churches. a huge draw is the course's dialogical nature and its emphasis on relationship.

what a wonderful and diverse group of folks. levi and i had the opportunity to share a rental car from the airport with dave nodar, who nicky gumbel asked to be the north america contact between alpha and the roman catholic church. bob buford, who founded the Leadership Network was there as well as ali hanna, who founded alpha in the united states. i think that under todd hunter's leadership (todd was there too, of course) we're going to see some very interesting things from this group in days to come.

levi and i also had the chance to have dinner at the wonderful blue mesa - a place with exquisite aesthetics and awesome sweet potato chips. rex miller showed up and ended up buying us dinner! All in all, a really great time.

british christianity & renewal article on the emerging church

The June issue of the british Christianity + Renewal magazine has a thoughtful article on the emerging church.

new kind of emergent convention

doug pagitt posts plans to change the way the emergent convention looks next year.

brian mclaren and chuck colson discussion

On 9 December 2003, Chuck Colson wrote a column in Christianity Today in which he began, "Is postmodernism—the philosophy that claims there is no transcendent truth—on life support? It may be premature to sign the death certificate, but there are signs postmodernism is losing strength...." Brian McLaren wrote a response to Chuck's column and sent it to him. Brian just revealed that in February of 2004, Chuck responded to Brian and Brian also wrote, "If you would like to dialogue about his article, my response, and his reply, may I suggest you start a thread at emergentvillage.com, theooze.com, or faithmaps.com? I am not planning to reply, although there is much here that strikes me as deserving a response. My hope would be that some of Chuck’s close friends might engage him in dialogue about these matters, or perhaps he and I will have an opportunity to dialogue in person and in private in the future. This interchange at least makes our differences clear, and does so in a cordial way."

jen has second thoughts

jen comments on her earlier screedesque comments.

i left jen this comment:

k, here's what I think: i think that lecture, book, sermon, conference, learnings are *great* as long as we operationalize them. as long as we turn them into actions. as long as we make the propositional transpropositional. evangelicals (and others surely) tend to be addicted to mere propositionalism and emergers can easily be infected by the same disease if they aren't careful. jesus said the dual bottom lines are loving God and others so all that is learned *must* end up doing that or it's a waste of time. [stephen descends from soapbox]

dan & phil hate the term "emerging church"

more definition conversation

jordon points to si johnson who pointed to bono

a wonderful speech

jen lemen slams the info-centric life

jen said something like what i had said earlier, but she said it more artfully.

rex miller

just discovered that in my earlier comments on rex miller and his forthcoming book, The Millennium Matrix, i had the wrong link for his interview with NEXT.

All Consuming

Looks interesting...

"All Consuming is a website that watches weblogs for books that they're talking about, and displays the most popular ones on an hourly basis. "

more on transpropositionality or information as the exclusive mode of spiritual transformation

In response to an earlier comment I made in the faithmaps discussion group, one of the 'mappers asked me,

Stephen, can you expand/clarify your point about your experience from Christian education institutions? I'm very curious. My own interest is what you have stated 'that my spiritual growth would be precipitated by information
transfer'.

While studying at Virginia Tech I decided that I wanted to teach Theology or New Testament at the graduate level. Accordingly, I transferred to Bryan College and ended up double-majoring in Bible and Greek (Classical and Koine). After I finished my undergrad work, I transferred to seminary to get an M.Div.

Halfway through my Masters I almost dropped out of school.

I had embarked on this course of study because I wanted to help prepare future church leaders by my teaching in some Christian institute of higher learning. That was my end in mind. But about halfway into my three year program, I came to the conclusion that seminary wasn't preparing men and women to be spiritual leaders but rather preparing them to teach and to study. One day one of my professors even said, "We don't train you how to be pastors; we train you how to answer Bible questions."

Now don't misunderstand; I don't mean to depreciate the nonnegotiable necessity of academic study. But intellectual knowledge is only a component of spiritual change, albeit a critical one. So I didn't believe the entire theological educational process was defunct; it was just that I had chosen this particular career path so that I might train future leaders.

But because I wanted to complete what I had started and because I believed that having an M.Div would give me more credibility in future efforts to craft a new (really an old) way of preparing future spiritual leaders, I decided to complete my course of study. And so I decided to do my Masters thesis on how pastors were developed in the first century and stayed in school.

The emerging church conversation and the pomoChristian critique of an inordinately modernized evangelicalism provided me a paradigm within which to understand my earlier concerns and a vocabulary to express them.

One can argue that a modern Cartesian epistemology, with its emphasis on certainty derived from the human mind, lays a framework for an overdependence on information. Descartes is considered the father of modernity. In his Discourse, he wrote,

all things…are mutually connected in the same way, and that there is nothing so far removed from us as to be beyond our reach, or so hidden that we cannot discover it….

The mind is presented as omnicompetent epistmelogically. There is no category of knowledge outside of its reach. And so we suggest that linear, sequential and propositional knowledge becomes all important.

One of the beauties of propositional knowledge is that it's quantifiable and easily measurable. It's understandable that many would greatly desire for spiritual development to be something that could be gauged by correct answers on a test. Assessing successful information transfer is quantifiable, measurable and certain.

But it's far more difficult to evaluate me on, say, how I'm doing as a husband, as a father and as a son. Information transfer measurement doesn't capture how I respond when I'm unfairly and harshly criticized. And yet it is at these moments and in these contexts that my true spiritual mettle is exposed.

Propositional knowledge, what we've called propositionalism, is necessary but not entirely adequate for spiritual change. We've suggested that the transpropositional is also necessary.

Transpropositionality is a concept that the 'mapper community began developing three years ago. See Key faithmaps discussion group postings on transpropositionality
from the faithmaps discussion group. In a nutshell, transpropositionality designates reality which cannot be readily captured in lexical symbols. The term addresses what words cannot convey. A very simple example would be a kiss. A kiss wordlessly communicates what cannot be entirely conveyed by sentences. For another example, consider the difference between an e-mail exchange between two friends and the same conversation over a fine meal.

We do not believe this is a new concept, just perhaps somewhat of a new formulation of it packed up into one word. We believe that Jesus transpropositionally developed his disciples to be leaders and that his followers did the same.

When Jesus chose his principal proteges, he did so "so that they would be with Him" (Mark 3:14a, all quotes New American Standard Bible unless otherwise noted and emphasis mine). When the Jewish leaders saw how confident Peter and John, though "uneducated and untrained men, they were amazed, and began to recognize them as having been with Jesus" (Acts 4). Paul enjoined Timothy to consider the relational context of the things he had learned when he writes, "You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them" (2 Timothy 3:14).

When we think about the seasons of our life when we experienced significant spiritual growth because of outside influences, we don't normally think of books and lectures; we think of names. Similarly, first century spiritual formation wasn't just propositional but also transpropositional because it was so often occuring in relational contexts.

Paul tells the church in Corinth, "So I ask you to follow my example and do as I do" (1 Corinthians 4:16, New Living Translation). Their learning came not just through Paul's words but through Paul's example. He similarly speaks to the church in Phillipi, "What you have learned and received and heard and seen in me - practice these things, and the God of peace will be with you" (Philippians 4:9, English Standard Version).

The relational, organic, holistic, transpropositional leadership development that we see in the first century is not collapsable to mere formulae. Rather, it's variable, real, dynamic and living. This observation doesn't imply a complete interdiction of structure. It does call for a skepticism toward the modern belief that the perfectly formed spiritual development program will yield the perfect result. Information is most definitely a component of this development. But it is only a component.


We've expanded on these thoughts in the "Delights and Dangers of Postmodernism" series and in "Christian Discipleship in Postmodernity: Toward a Praxis of Spiritual Friendship" found here.

more on the da vinci code

just discovered this special section that Christian History put together on The Da Vinci Code.

a to z of the emerging church

Marc van der Woude brought our attention to a feb 2004 post by steve taylor. I had missed this in my earlier around the room ab blogdom's 2004 Q1 discussion on defining the emerging church.

emergent in nashville

justin baeder has done some nice and tidy summaries of some of the sessions he's attending.

typepad

is it just me or does every blog using typepad seem to load slower than all others? i haven't just noticed this today; anyone else experiencing this>

Objective and Subjective Truth

The 'mappers have been discussing Pagels:

One of the yin - yang struggles that has been addressed in the pomoChristian thoughtspace has been the tension between subjective and objective. In the Witherington article I referenced earlier today he writes of Pagels:

The New Gnostic Faith Some 20 years after she wrote The Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagels penned the beautifully written Beyond Belief. In a particularly candid and confessional part of the book, Pagels talks about how she had been alienated from Christian faith while in high school: She was part of an evangelical church when a Jewish friend died, and her fellow Christians told her that since the friend was not born again, she was going to hell.

Though this turned her off from the church, she maintained a lively interest in New Testament studies and the early church. While doing doctoral work at Harvard, she had an epiphany. She was reading the Gospel of Thomas when she came across this saying of Jesus: "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you."

She comments: "The strength of this saying is that it does not tell us what to believe but challenges us to discover what lies hidden within ourselves; and with a shock of recognition, I realized that this perspective seemed to me self evidently true."

Her comparison of the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of John reveals how far down this road she has traveled. In John, there is an "I-and-Thou" relationship, a vine and branches relationship, that involves an integral connection between the divine and human without identification of the "I" with the "Thou." But in Thomas, it is a matter of "I am Thou." The self is deified and is seen as the finish line of faith.

Here we find the appeal to personal impressions or experience as the final authority. The believer is not asked to believe specific things that come from without (by revelation), nor to submit to any authority but the self. Instead, we are to be the measure of ourselves and to find our own truths within us.

In this book, we see Pagels's story of suffering and feeling betrayed, and her long spiritual journey to a reconfigured form of Christianity—reconfigured as self-actualization. And it is evident that the gnostic texts have helped lead her in that direction.

Pagels is not a disinterested scholar when she writes about Gnosticism. Her spiritual journey entices her to look at the gnostic texts in a particular way, and to postulate an early and widespread authority for them—and then to suggest that the process of New Testament canonization was arbitrary. Orthodox scholars are similarly tempted in their own direction. I know I am. So we are wise to recognize this potential bias in evaluating any argument. But in the end, we still have to make arguments based on history, not on silence.

link

Apart from legitimate criticisms of Pagel's revisionist adventures, I think that this subjective/objective discussion is extremely healthy for Christ's church. As - and I paint with broad brush - the evangelical church as been addicted to the objective - the 'mappers usually say "the propositional" - I see movement toward the subjective (the "the transpropositional") as being healthy.

There are scylla and charybdis to be avoided here, of course. We've written reams of emails to one another in the 'mapper community about the problem with hyperobjectivism. But we also have to be wary of absolutizing the subjective. Error is possible on either extreme.

And there is a larger issue beyond the philosophical. We are the created and He is the Creator. We are ontologically relative to Him. We are epistemologically dependent on Him. We are neither the final criterion, nor the final arbiter of truth. He is Truth. His Truth is intensely objective in its solidity (clearly I'm lapsing into metaphor here) and rigorously subjective in the response it demands. We cannot apprehend it if we arbitrarily truncate it to the merely two-dimensional propositional. Truth - in its most holistic form - melds the subjective and the objective in sometimes indistinquishable ways.

The Da Vinci Code and Elaine Pagels

Asbury's Ben Witherington III takes on The Da Vinci Code and Elaine Pagels in an article posted today over at Christianity Today's website.

church of fools

rats! today i meant to mention to rex church of fools. very interesting project!

dj @ emergent

dj is really giving us a lot of emergent coverage.

cicadas

truth is, I'm totally enjoying the cicadas. i think they're sound is beautiful! NPR ran a nice piece this afternoon if you'd like to hear what they sound like and learn more about them.

Rex Miller's The Millennium Matrix

Had lunch today with Rex Miller, whose Millennium Matrix is being published in May by Jossey-Bass and Leadership Network. Just over four years ago Jordon Cooper gave us a hint of what was to come with Mr. Miller and his ideas. LN's NEXT ran an interview of Rex and the Millenium Matrix that you can read here.

I love Rex's iconoclastic and original heart and mind. He's a wonderful synthesizer of information and is passionate on his subject.

the English Standard Version

One of the 'mappers commented today that he was enjoying the English Standard Version. I've been reading mostly the ESV for a few months now and it's replaced my former preferences which were The New International Version in the OT and the New American Standard Bible in the NT. I think it hits a sweet spot between the more literal translations (KJV, NKJV and the NASB)and the more paraphrastic versions (NIV, NLT, LB). For some more info see faithmaps.org's section on Bible Translations.

technorati - search engine for live blog content

technorati enables users to search live blog content.

"Technorati provides search and notification services for active content on the World Live Webtm. We monitor over 1.8 million sources (weblogs, RSS) with over 10,000 new sources added each day, all with a median index update time of under 9 minutes"

See more on their FAQ page.

honest talk from anil dash ab movable type 3.0's pricing and licensing fiasco

jordon alerted us to the fact that anil is moving to sf to be closer to the center of six apart's radar, and anil talks frankly about the controversy.

Main Entry: vine
Pronunciation: 'vIn
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Old French vigne, from Latin vinea vine, vineyard, from feminine of vineus of wine, from vinum wine -- more at WINE
1 : GRAPE 2
2 a : a plant whose stem requires support and which climbs by tendrils or twining or creeps along the ground; also : the stem of such a plant b : any of various sprawling herbaceous plants (as a tomato or potato) that lack specialized adaptations for climbing

from Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

i've done it again. lately things have been going great at work, busy with a big project that was much appreciated. i'm doing some work/consulting with a national ministry that's been completely exciting and mentally stimulating. and i've been thoroughly enjoying jumping back into blogdom.

and then last night i realized that i'm once again lost in mission.

now there's a good lost in mission and there's a bad lost in mission. good lost in mission is when you are driven by love of God and others. when you are constrained because of gratitude for Christ's love. that is worship - pure and beautiful. love incarnate and holiness operationalized.

but, while i might be able to say that some purer motives obtain, sometimes when i get lost in busyness, God gets lost in the process. though my parents are wonderful people, for various reasons i grew up alone and very bored (there's a lot more detail behind that). so for the last 15 years or so my fear and loathing of being bored have driven me to lose my Lord in my frenetic efforts to escape ennui.

this makes my efforts too important. the exerting of effort itself becomes a fruit rather than that which produces fruit. though i may be involved in what prima facie appears to be perfectly valid and worthwhile activity, the very drivenness of it detracts. And - indeed -

"And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing."

1 Cor 13:2 (all quotes English Standard Version)

The alternative for me? That place which I've sometimes touched but to which, from time to time, I have to bring myself back. A place of abiding in Christ. it's important to save that phrase from the trite and mundane and to recapture its original richness. it is, truly, an amazing johannine concept.

john's classic statement on the concept is in John 15:1-5

"I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch of mine that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing."

what does that look like? i freely admit i don't entirely know but i've gotten a taste.

scripture seems to indicate it involves:

.... choosing an extreme belief in Jesus.

see John 6:47 with 6:54a. i see "eating jesus' flesh and drinking his blood" in 6:54 as indicating the radical nature of this belief. see also 1 John 2:23,24, 1 John 4:15, and 2 John 9. Thankfully, this faith is not just dependent on our own strength. We know that God is the one who authors and perfects our faith (Hebrews 12:2)

...choosing to bask in the love that God has for us.

see John 15:9 and 1 John 4:16

Also consider the enormity of what Paul writes in his letter to the church @ Ephesus

[Paul prays that the Ephesians] "may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God." (3:18,19)

Paul stretches to the limits of language in his effort to capture with words the transpropositional love of God. And don't miss that he connects our being filled with God directly with our consciousness of God loving us. And just as we saw that we cannot believe in God unless God authors our faith, so also here we see that God is the one who gives us the ability to even mentally grasp his love because Paul prays for it

...choosing to love others

see John 15:10-12, 1 John 2:3-7, and 1 John 4:12,13. And just as God authors our faith, just as God gives us the ability to begin to wrap our brains around how much he loves us, so also God enables us to love others, for love is a fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22)

there are, of course, myriad implications from all this regarding the ways that we cultivate abiding in Jesus. but there's one big implication: it's not just by trying harder. our choice is not one just of extra effort or new activity. our choice is one of extreme dependence - to throw ourselves upon Him because He's the One who gives us faith, He's the One who helps us accept the mind-boggling extent of his love for us, and He's the One who works in us to love others.

He saves us from the smallness of a life sucked in upon itself.

emergent bloggers

emergent has posted their own nashville blogger list for the convention.

brian mclaren on abu ghraib

"Being saved, baptized, sincere, or even Spirit-filled is not a short cut to being smart or right or wise. "

"A friend at my church once told me, 'Brian, I think you’re right about 85% of the time. That’s what makes you dangerous. People will trust you for the 85% so they won’t question you for the 15%. Your leadership depends on you having the humility and second thoughts to be on guard for the 15%.' Could our nation and its leaders be in a similar situation?"

Brian's posted a thought-provoking piece on his website.

Brian's comments about America viewing itself as a "beacon of light" and Manifest Destiny reminded me of an Alan Johnson article called The Bible and War: An Historical Survey (on faithmaps.org's War and Terrorism Page)where Dr. Johnson drills down on the history of the church in the United States and its relationship to US wars.

list of emergent nashvegas speakers

as andrew jones laments his absence from the confab, he also provides load of links to the speakers.

blogging @ the emergent convention in nashville

i am paradox lists folks blogging at the emergent stuff happening right now in nashvegas (he lets us know this is the proper designation). Thanks to DJ for the heads up on this link.

hey, if anyone finds some kind of definitive list of emergent gathering bloggers in nashville, would you comment?

free movable type blog hosting!

This still seems too good to be true, but there's a group out there giving free Movable Type hosting to bloggers who are affiliated with certain cities, like Baltimore (my city), Atlanta, Boston, etc. See the bottom of the Baltimore site for a complete list of cities.

I've set one up and am going to start playing with it and may make the switch. I do like MT quite a bit. But I also am enjoying the new blogger interface.

faithmaps.org desperately needs a redesign

Though I have some broken links, I'm pretty happy with our content, but we really need a new aesthetic. Here are some of the sites I'm looking at:

http://www.ecclesiahouston.org/

http://www.cre8d-design.com/journal/archives/cat_blog_design_showcase.php

http://www.highindustrial.com/

http://www.balthaser.com/builder/fx_boot.asp

http://www.profitpatterns.com/

http://www.3dnewmedia.com/v1.0/index.htm

http://movies.guide.real.com/

http://www.stimulus.com/v/5/flash/v5.swf

http://www.kmgi.com/

If you see sites like this, please feel free to email me a url!

church online

mark van de woude has an interesting post on how church is being expressed in blogdom. He references Tim Bednar's article "We Know More Than Our Pastors: Why Bloggers are the Vanguard of The Participatory Church."

emerging "evangelism"

"Relationship is our mantra. Out of relationship equity can be built in a persons life, and out of that equity we can speak life, and awaken the need for an experience with the maker of the universe. "

Levi Fuson

Levi explores the intersection of emerging church and evangelism.

This is a conversation that needs to happen. Lots of questions; here's one: Is the word "evangelism" so hopelessly bound with the pre-modern and the modern that we need to craft a new term that captures its transcultural signficance?

Good to Great

USA TODAY ran a nice article today on Good to Great , written by Jim Collins, and its exploding popularity.

Here's some highlights from the book:

Core Concepts from Good to Great by Jim Collins

Level 5 Leadership

• “Level 5 leaders embody a paradoxical mix of personal humility and professional will. They are ambitious, to be sure, but ambitious first and foremost for the company, not themselves.” p. 39

• “set up their successors for even greater success….” p. 39

• The Window and the Mirror: credit others with success, blame themselves for failures. p. 39

• Usually arise from within the organization p. 40

First Who…Then What

• The primary leader is not a “genius with a thousand helpers” p. 62

• Take your time in hiring decisions. Make people changes quickly if changes are needed. p. 62

• “put your best people on your biggest opportunities, not your biggest problems.” p. 62

• These management teams debate openly and then unify behind the decision.

The Stockdale paradox

• Confront the Brutal Facts but never Lose Faith

• “A primary task in taking a company from good to great is to create a culture wherein people have a tremendous opportunity to be heard and, ultimately, for the truth to be heard.” p. 88

• “Creating a climate where the truth is heard involves four basic practices:

• “Lead with questions, not answers.
• Engage in dialogue and debate, not coercion.
• Conduct autopsies, without blame.
• Build red flag mechanisms that turn information into information that cannot be ignored.” p. 88

The Hedgehog Concept

· What’s the “Big Idea” of your company?

• The Three Circles

• What are you deeply passionate about?
• What you can be best in the world at?
• What drives your economic engine?

A Culture of Discipline

• “A culture of discipline involves a duality. On the one hand it requires people who adhere to a consistent system; yet on the other hand, it gives people freedom and responsibility within the framework of that system.” p. 142

• “The single most important form of discipline for sustained results is the fanatical adherence to the Hedgehog Concept and the willingness to shun opportunities that fall outside the three circles.” p. 142

• “’Stop doing’ lists are more important than “to do” lists. p. 143

Technology Accelerators

· Technologies that optimize a companies strength and drive its growth

The Flywheel and the Doom Loop

• “Sustained transformation follow a predictable pattern of buildup and breakthrough. Like pushing on a giant, heavy flywheel, it takes a lot of effort to get the thing moving at all, but with persistent pushing in a consistent direction over a long period of time, the flywheel builds momentum, eventually hitting a point of breakthrough.” p. 186

• “…the good-to-great transformations never happened in one fell swoop.” p. 186


For a nice summary and thoughts on Good to Great see this Fast Company article on Good to Great. Also check out other Collins' articles @ his library

helpful cautions against ethnocentric emerging church analysis!

I received a very helpful comment from Matthew Glock in response to my note on describing the emerging church that helpfully knocked off, for a few moments anyway, my ethnocentric glasses. Matthew, who works in France, gently reminded me that the state of conversation in the States and in the larger English-speaking world is not necessarily representative of Christian subcultures across all countries. What's "emerging" in the English-speaking world isn't necessarily "emerging" everywhere. In a telling post, Matthew comments, "your average French Christian could care less about understanding the modern/post-modern transition." Matthew asks some good transculture questions that help to diagnose exacly what emerging needs to occur in whatever context:

"Are we loving God with all that we are?
Are we loving our neighbors as ourselves?
Are we inviting people to join us in our journey?
What are we doing that is tied to cultural norms that are not relevant those who are outside our community of faith and don't find their place in the Bible?"

Matthew also turned me on to the comments of Jonathan Finley, also in France, who posted The Metissage of the Church.

Jonathan notes:

"it seems to me that the "emerging church" discussion has essentially grown out of a cleavage between sub-cultural expressions of the church within Anglo-Saxon cultures. i suspect that the usage of the word "culture", as in the "emerging culture", springs from an essentially monocultural world view and actually means "subculture". anyway, the "emergent culture" seems to be an essentially english-speaking, white boy's world (sorry girls and the rest of the planet). it seems these boys don't want their "father’s Oldsmobile" anymore (yes, girls and boys, i’m provoking you). i must agree with this much: someone has disengaged the parking brake on this shiny relic, the “modern, western church,” and has sent it coasting driverless (even purposeless ;-) toward an eminent and brutal collision with a post-modern present. I'm not claiming to even know what post-modern means (before you do, read this), but i do agree that the shift is real, radical, and sprawling. "

but then says

"However, I don’t find much in the “emergent” conversation that helps me to understand the multi-cultural suburbs of Paris...."

Jonathan and Matthew's comments both cautioned me not to look at things emergesque from such a narrow perspective and I appreciate the yellow light.

meeting fellow emerging bloggers in realtime

Beth and I and the girls visited Cedar Ridge Community Church where Brian McLaren pastors and where Beth and I met, got married and attended for 13 years. It was a wonderful visit! We went forward to speak with Brian and Grace and finally got the chance to meet fellow blogger jen lemen! she filled us in on her recent adventures in taking dancing lessons and beth and I told her about how when I dance (very badly), I have a look on my face as if I'm trying to solve the national debt.

We also had a the chance to catch up a little bit with DJ Chaung who multi-churches at Cedar Ridge and elsewhere.

wrapping the brain around the emerging church

Earlier this year, there was quite a bit of talk in emerging church blogdom about the legitimacy or illegitimacy of declaring it a movement or defining it or attempting to put any lines around it at all. Andrew Jones may have begun the ball rolling after a British magazine queried him for a definition. Just the day before, Alan Creech encouraged us not to think of the emerging church conversation as a movement. Steve Knight does a good job at picking up the narrative from that point bringing us up to do Brian McLaren's February 2004 Letter to Friends of Emergent where he says the idea of a postmodern church is ridiculous. This got Brian in a bit of trouble and he later nuanced his earlier statements by acknowledging that he was being somewhat iconoclastic in his earlier missive. Around this same time, Dan Thompson provided a definition of "emerging church" to Wikipedia and then later blogged some more quite excellent thoughts about the emerging church. Andrew also did finally formulate his shot at a definition and, later in February, Mark van der Woude interviewed Andrew again for even more thoughts on the topic. Reading all of these contributions to the topic is truly an education and genuinely does aid in understanding this movement/conversation/thing we term "emerging church".

One could curmudgeonly argue that any attempt to nail down a definition by such a self-confessedly postmodern group of folks is self-referentially incoherent (think smoke coming out of the back of the android’s head while Spock intones, “Everything I say to you is a lie.”). After all, postmodernism itself is summarized, albeit questionably, as denying the human mind’s ability to define anything and language's ability to communicate accurately. And while many have argued against that old saw as not being a legitimate reason to completely ignore all postmodern thoughtthreads, nevertheless emergers do typically embrace mystery and are hesitant to rest calmly in the comforting bounds of a definition or some finite list of characteristics.

Nevertheless, there really does seem to be a loosely configured, cross-organizational group of folks that swim in the same kind of faithsea together. Consider: one does tend to lump brian mclaren with leonard sweet, len with spencer burke, and spence with john o’keefe. So if you’re nodding your head right now, there are reasons you agree with me. Why do you agree? What do they have in common? Somehow you intuitively know that these thoughtleaders and many others share some common list of characteristics. Why do they all seem to be swimming in the same direction? So call it a movement or a conversation or just “emerging church” there is a ... something!

So while I’m not going to attempt to provide a definition or a definitive list of characteristics, let me at least provisionally suggest two primary characteristics. Then, if you’ll allow me, I’d like to engage in the very modern enterprise of suggesting steps of emerging church development. And I don't mean to suggest at all that churches can't skip steps or that it typically plays out in this way. I mean the steps to be more of a logical (oops, modern word) sequence (oops, another modern word) rather than a suggested chronological description of a common progression.

I suggest that many emerging faith communities have in common one of two primary characteristics and sometimes both: they’re speaking-out or they’re speaking-in.

speaking-out:

They are either “constrained”, to use Darby’s wonderful translation of 2 Cor. 5:14, by love of Jesus to translate spiritualities into a language that the folks in their postmodern community can understand (think jew to jew, greek to greek ).

and/or

speaking-in:

Similarly, these or other spiritual communities are moved by their love of our Lord to evangelize their fellow Christians to understand that perhaps they’ve been duped by modernity into believing that they’ll grow to love God and others more merely by information transfer or program or structure or rote or whatever. Speakers-in want to convince everyone that spiritual formation is much more organic and dynamic than that. They seek to convert their Christian friends to a more transpropositional mode.

Dan Thompson, in discussing the definition of “Emerging Church” resonates with this speaking-in motivation when he notes , “I get the sense that the people who would identify themselves with the Emerging Church movement are all either trying to deconstruct, or reconstruct Christianity.” He also well notes: “I think the predominant deconstructionists are going to be suspicious of the predominant reconstructionists because it feels like they’re building just another meta-narrative to oppress them with. Meanwhile, I imagine the predominant reconstructionists are there wishing the predominant deconstructionists would stop being class half empty kind of people intent on questioning nearly everything they try and do.”

Emergent Stage One

Extending Dan’s fine analysis: I just met someone who moved across the entire country to join a church staff after they convinced him that they were bona fide, cutting edge, pomoChristian emerging. But after he arrived he came to believe that they only had a “candles and incense” emergent aesthetic as they were still encouraging him to grow disciples in a way my friend found non-relational and by the numbers. These types of churches are commendably striving to speak-out, to speak jew to jew and greek to greek. Let’s call them Emergent Stage One. Some people stop here and do wonderful things for God. Some folks are more resonant with what we would call more modern presentations of spiritual truth.

Emergent Stage Two

But other spiritual communities are realizing that the emerging church conversation speaks to more than mere translation. Leaders of these bodies are realizing that the emerging phenomenon (and Bill Bean likes that word best) does more than merely provide them with an alternative vocabulary. Rather, it critiques not only their style of church but also the very way they do church. Church communities do sometimes need to be critiqued when they’ve been inordinately modernized. They’ve reached Emergent State Two. This is a stage of questioning, analysis and evaluation. But, as Dan intimates, this stage can be dangerous because it’s possible for a community’s leadership to stay in deconstructive mode beyond its time of effectiveness.

Emergent Stage Three

Other healthy communities have survived Stage Two trauma; they’ve actually kept what they needed to have kept from pre-Stage One and Stage One; and they’ve made critical reconstructionist changes in light of Stage Two insights. Somewhat stabilized and confident – not in their knowledge but in their Lord - these spiritual communities break out of critical self-absorption and return to the very legitimate State Onesque love for their larger communities. They now translate well and as they draw others within their circle through Jesus’ love (and not primarily through their electronica and multimedia) they more organically and holistically help them to love God and others. They are at Emergent Stage Three.

And they will be happy there.

Until the inevitable moment when they’re confronted with the need for Post-Emergent Stage One. And then, of course, someone from a magazine asks one of Andrew's kids for a definition....

dj's who joke about beheading are fired

i would certainly hope so.

brian mclaren

found a nice brian mclaren page this morning, courtesy of dj chuang.

david and melissa hopkins announce kennedy elizabeth hopkins!!!

Born: Tuesday, 5/11/04, 2:50pm (CST)
6 lbs, 3 oz., 19"

Congratulations!!!

death of a dream, birth of a dream

wonderful story about Phil Vischer, VeggieTales, & the fall of Big Idea.

yahoogroups archiving solution!?

Thanks to Dean for providing me with a potential solution and for the offer to help! Unfortunately, I don't know Perl or Dean's email address but I've asked the 'mappers to pitch in!

apparent deletion of archives on yahoogroups

I was surfing john o'keefe's Postmodern Theology Discussion Group when it seemed that I could not surf earlier than message #3157

This hasn't happened in the faithmaps discussion group yet, but I seem to remember that yahoo announced they were going to begin doing deleting older messages to save space. I really HATE this because I like have a written record of the history of our online communities and there's no easy way I know of to archive old messages other than doing so one at a time. Before 'mapper jon gold passed on I valued his contributions to the 'mapper community so much that I actually archived and indexed his posts (jon was a brilliant professional philosopher, a pastor, and a dear friend). It was a labor-intensive process and I honestly can't see doing for the 10's of 1000's of 'mapper posts.

Moreover, I view the archives of this and several other emerging discussion groups as a rich repository of information. One could argue that a significant portion of the history of the emerging church movement has been in these groups. I think a long time ago I emailed yahoo inquiring as to whether archived messages might be avail for purchase, but I don't think I've ever received a response from yahoo about anything I've ever emailed them about.

ugh - any brilliant ideas?

NT Wright

Jason Clark found a very nice NT Wright site.

Articles of Note

Christianity Today reports on the Evangelical Press Association's Higher Goal Awards of which the publication won 32. Be sure to check out Agnieszka Tennant's award-winning interview with Anne Lamont and Ted Olsen's piece on Tony Campolo.

More Christian Groups Respond to Abu Ghraib

Ted Olsen reports that more groups have responded.

Christianity Today Selects 2004 Book Awards

NT Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God and Dan Kimball's The Emerging Church are among the winners.

Five All Time Favorite Business Books

Someone just asked me to give them these so I thought I'd blog it too:

In no certain order:

1 - The Leadership Challenge by Kouzes and Posner

Summary

2 - Built to Last by Collins and Porras

Summary

3 - Good to Great by Jim Collins

4 - The Fifth Discipline by Peter Senge

Summary

5 - Primal Leadership by Dan Goleman

Enjoy!

jordon cooper's the ooze blog roundup

the amazing jordon cooper provides us with The Ooze Annual Blog Tools Roundup.

rachel cunliffe speaks

if you are looking for some wonderful blog designs, see rachel's wonderful colllection of notable blogs.

Major General Antonio M. Taguba

The Washington Post ran a good article (free registation required) today profiling Major General Taguba of whom I blogged yesterday.

Abu Ghraib

Major General Antonio M. Taguba, who, according to the Washington Post, is "the second highest-ranking Filipino American in the U.S. Army" advised the Senate Armed Service Committee that his investigation revealed that the six or seven MPs who abused Iraqi prisoners did not do so as a result of orders from their superiors. He nevertheless concluded that there was a "Failure in leadership...from the brigade commander on down, lack of discipline, no training whatsoever and no supervision."

Ted Olsen provides us with a round robin of Christian commentary on the incidents, including a mention of which organizations have not yet commented. Yesterday Jordon Cooper also let us know of a couple of interesting quotes from various politicos and bloggers on the subject.

These actions were reprehensible. The American government is responsible to investigate these inhumanities thoroughly and bring justice to the situation.

trolling for emerging alpha users

do you use alpha?

are you under 35 years old?

or do you know someone like this?

would you send me an email letting me know?

todd hunter, alpha's new president in the united states, is looking for jesusfolk of this flavour to provide feedback about their thoughts on all things alphaesque.

we're also especially interested in church planters who also meet these two criteria.

Thanks!

todd hunter - new Alpha USA President

emerger coach todd hunter has accepted a position with alpha as their new president! (also see their more robust international site). todd recently gave an interview to off-the-map. and he asked eric keck to announce it in the blogosphere. the 'mappers have been discussing this and there's also a good bit of discussion about it on the off-the-map site. as todd says, he still plans to stay very much in the emerging church conversation and, in fact, alpha has asked him to do so.

the great blog relaunch

love it!

charlotte

bethany and i had a great time visiting charlotte this weekend and got the chance to meet the amazing steve and becky knight both at warehouse242 and at dinner afterwards. the music at 242 was amazing; baptisms on easter sunday totally rocked and the knights were just tremendous hosts. we met steve and becky after scoping out the charlotte indies allies site which i blatantly joined though i live just south of baltimore.

on the passing of carl fh henry

blake wrote a verse that has meant an enormous amount to me through the years:

He who bends to himself a joy
Does the winged life destroy;
But he who kisses the joy as it flies
Lives in eternity's sunrise.

somehow I have always known that my time with my little ones [michaela siobhan (7), skye teresa (5) and alia noelle (3)] would be very brief. When I have held them - tonight, even, when chalea and I were on one of our "dates" driving from ice cream to walmart where she was going to spend some christmas money - i realized that this was a brief moment and I needed to cherish it, but not hold it too tightly to my chest because i simply can't have it for long. On new years day, I was walking through Patuxent Valley State Park with Alia on my shoulders playing "Where's Alia?" And she would laugh and then she would bend her little blond head in front of mine, first left and then right so that I would see just where she - in fact - was.

In just a little time, my precious little birds will fly away and my nest will be empty.

In just a little more time (with God's grace), my time will be nearly gone and I will decline.

I've been reading through 2nd Chronicles and I so want to end my brief sojourn in time well. Its sobering to read of the Israeli kings who lived well and then lost their path at the end. I'm so happy to hear that Dr. Henry kept in the way until the end.

The other day I reminded beth that we have many pains ahead. Both of my parents and Beth's mom are alive and they will not live forever. Our daughters (by God's grace) will hit the teenage years and will surely break our hearts (could it not be so perhaps?). And we will grow old. I reminded Bethany that the time is now to invest in those things that will make our hearts and souls strong so that when these storms hit we will stand in Jesus Christ. I cannot find the quote, but somewhere Thomas Jefferson, who I believe lost most or all of his kids and his wife before he passed, wrote that we spend our lives preparing for the moments of supreme sorrow.

I want to be faithful and be strong in God so that I will remember what really matters when it matters the most.

God help us all to have an end as well-regarded as Carl FH Henry's.

does God ever hate church?

not that long ago if you were christian, you went to church; if you weren't, you didn't. lately it seems to be more and more common for people to be committed to following jesus but uninterested, if not antagonistic, toward church. this phenomenon is gathering increasing attention. witness Sociologist Dr. Alan Jamieson's recent tome A Churchless Faith.

Yesterday I was reading Isaiah 1:12ff

12"When you come to appear before me,
who has required of you
this trampling of my courts?
13Bring no more vain offerings;
incense is an abomination to me.
New moon and Sabbath and the calling of convocations--
I cannot endure iniquity and solemn assembly.
14Your new moons and your appointed feasts
my soul hates;
they have become a burden to me;
I am weary of bearing them.
15When you spread out your hands,
I will hide my eyes from you;
even though you make many prayers,
I will not listen;
your hands are full of blood.
16Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean;
remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes;
cease to do evil,
17learn to do good;
seek justice,
correct oppression;
bring justice to the fatherless,
plead the widow's cause.
18"Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD:
though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they are red like crimson,
they shall become like wool.
19If you are willing and obedient,
you shall eat the good of the land;
20but if you refuse and rebel,
you shall be eaten by the sword;
for the mouth of the LORD has spoken."

(English Standard Version)

and it occurred to me: I bet sometimes God hates church too.

leadership formation

yesterday i had a great lunch with one of my teammates on our church's adult ministry leadership team. we were discussing our leadership development plan for the rest of 2003 and 2004 which we are soon presenting to our entire team. during the meeting, i was reminded of lyndon johnson.

this past summer during the 2-3 hours a day i spend commuting between just south of baltimore and northern virginia, i've been listening to robert a caro's wonderfully exhaustive biographies of lyndon johnson - The Path to Power, the Means of Ascent and Master of the Senate. Caro began studying and writing ab lyndon in 1975. and if he takes as long to finish volume 4 of his johnson library as he has spent with the first 3 volumes leading up to johnson's presidency, he will have spent 4 decades studying and writing about his subject.

i think i will remember this past summer as "the summer of lyndon johnson."

lyndon johnson, apparently, was a man who - as caro puts it - was not limited in his ascent to power by ideology or ethics! but he was a genius at politics and truly "a master of the Senate." he was a far stronger senator than president. at the core of his formidable skillset was his ability to read men. he was a consummate strategist and an master salesman. he did not make a lot of speeches. most of his movements were not public ones. he hated reading books. he accomplished much of all that he achieved in the senate - and he achieved quite a bit, especially as a champion of civil rights - in one on one conversations. in the senate cloak room, on the telephone, in his senate office #231, etc.

caro's interest in lyndon was motivated by his desire to see how government and politics really worked. caro is fascinated by power and wished to study it. in the process, i think he's illustrated a principle not only for how government change occurs, but since government is nothing more than an aggregate of powerful people (plus rules, laws and tradition), caro has shown us how people-change occurs.

as i've listened to now tens of hours of these biographies over the last many weeks, as i've listened to how lyndon worked personally with folks to get done what he needed to get done, it's made me even more convinced that when we think of leadership development we need to think small. ministry programs, leadership structures, development paths - I am convinced - are nothing more than contexts within which the more foundational one-on-one development occurs. and i'm certainly not against these contexts. we need a means of transferring critical information about leadership without - however - relying on the information transfer alone as the primary means of leadership development. we've often, i fear, gotten it backwards in leadership development programs (and there are analogies here with spiritual development programs - actually that's primarily what i'm talking about). mentors and proteges don't serve the programs, structures, and classes, etc. rather all of these formal structures exist to serve the mentors and proteges. every such formalized entity we develop (leadership hierarchies, leadership workshops, seminars, conferences, reporting structures, reportage modalities, effectiveness criteria tracking etc) only exists as tools for the mentors and proteges to use.

some months ago my lunch mate and i had the chance to meet with our church's elders to talk about adult education. at that time i suggested to the team that when they thought of what had actually been spiritually transformative in their lives, what they principally thought about was not lectures or books or sermons, but faces and names. what has changed our lives has been people. books and articles and sermons and talks - and the contexts in which they occur - all have a place and are not to be depreciated. but they are not to be regarded, as we've said before, as the omnicompetent modality of spiritual transformation. we have to keep the main thing the main thing and those of us with leadership responsibilities in the church have to manage to relationships and not view relationships as being merely serendipitous to spiritual change. relationships are the very engine of spiritual change and we musn't lose sight of that.

in the short term it will feel slower. it won't be as dramatic as one person lecturing to 10,000. but in the long term, as we create a culture of leadership that includes as a primary value the critical necessity of constantly pouring our lives into future leaders, growth will become both exponential and holistic.

this is the best chance we have to recapture the past dynamism that Christ's church has intermittently displayed.

leaders must make leaders and not rely on their institutions to make leaders. the institutions can and should provide contexts and tools. but the work itself is personal and intimate.

star struck

Yes, it happened to me.

This past Monday, 15 September I walked into one of USA TODAY's conference rooms for our standard 8:30 AM Circulation Marketing meeting where the Director, our VP and other managers meet to discuss ways to convince folks to subscribe to our paper. I was the first one in the room, one of our many conference rooms in our beautiful new corporate headquarters where I have had the privilege of working since January of 2002. My office is about 50 feet behind this conference room. But there was a man there setting up bright lights, a camera and a microphone. Turns out that in 90 minutes bono of u2 was going to come to this very room to be interviewed by USA TODAY editors. I even got to do a sound check on the mike for the guy!

bono was in town to "appeal to america's greatness" and to meet with President Bush about treating AIDS in Africa.

i will confess that I was a bit star-struck. I wasn't the only one. folks were standing around the glass-enclosed conference room watching the back of bono's head. a co-worker of mine just walked right up to him and shook his hand. it occurred to me how unusual it must be to be surrounded by such throughts and stratagems every day of your life.

but bono's message was an important one and he's been delivering it for a while now.

you can see clips from the interview by clicking "see it for yourself" in Whitney Matheson's column on the event.

kingdom leaders

tonight Clay Carver of soul horizon, ron willoughby, and mark goodrich of grace community church had a great teleconference call with todd hunter. he was gracious enough to meet with us to discuss holistic leadership formation. clay and ron are involved in church planting and mark and I serve on grace community church's adult ministry team . we asked todd questions for ab an hour. towards the end of our talk, i wrote down 5 words that encapsulated my take away's (in no particular order):

service
friendship
competencies
knowledge
character

service and character

todd mentioned that modern evangelicalism has a tendency to front load our leadership development as if someone is qualified when the end of the program is reached. he suggested that instead we need to take a more holistic approach and to realize that life and experience are the best teachers and that it takes time.

i mentioned that as i've done hiring in my day job, i've realized that i have to hire folks at 94% and bring them to 97% but that i'll never get someone hired at 67% to 97%. todd suggested that the in establishing selection criteria that we look at character and service. he suggested that we focus on leaders already serving with good character. he suggests we over-rely on information.

friendship

after the meeting, i mentioned to mark, ron and clay that clay's qualification for ministry isn't clay, mdiv but rather clay, friend of ron. i walked away from our meeting thinking that a strong, confiding spiritual friendship is an absolute requirement as a leadership qualification.

knowledge

i do believe knowledge is a strong component of this; but - as i've written before here and elsewhere - knowledge is not the omnicompetent modality of spiritual transformation.

competencies

and - of course - competences are important. but we must remember as Bertoldo de Giovanni told Michelangelo, "Talent is cheap; dedication is costly." and dedication is the stuff of character.

what does all this mean?

i believe it means our best approaches must be more organic, holistic and relational rather than only systematized, proceduralized and structured. i don't believe systemic is intrinsically bad. but it is not primarily effective.

i believe we focus more on selection, looking for people of character *and* service accomplishment.

i believe we continue to do information transfer but not rely on it only.

i need to think ab all this more.

David K Clark's To Know and Love God

Dan Brennan has posted a review of Professor Clark's newest book.

Soul Horizon

Had a great time this morning breakfasting with Clay Carver and Dave Cowan of Soul Horizon and their friend Randy Millwood. A couple of members of Grace's Adult Ministry Leadership Team came and one of our Emerging Leaders came as well. We talked about holistic approaches to leadership development. It was rich!

And now, Postmodern Celtic Baptists

See for yourself!

letter from Chuck Smith to President Bush

Calvary Chapel pastor Chuck Smith joins Brian McLaren as a pastor who writes letters to our President.

new book on jonathan edwards by george marsden

Today's Washington Post Book Review pullout ran a review of George Marsden's new book on Jonathan Edwards. Looks like a good read.

the holistic development of spiritual leaders (or whither seminary)

Wrote a little more than I intended on this today in a note to a seminarian.

More on Iraqi War News

I am dedicated to my country (though not above my dedication to God). I also believe in the possbility of just war. But I also wasn't sure this was a just war.

On faithmaps.org's Iraqi War News Page, I added Arab and other international sources to the mix. Tonight I added Venik's Aviation (Russia), which has a one day delayed translation of iraqwar.ru. Here's what Venik's Aviation has to say about iraqwar.ru: "The IRAQWAR.RU analytical center was created recently by a group of journalists and military experts from Russia to provide accurate and up-to-date news and analysis of the war against Iraq." Be sure to also check out John Sutherland's article about this site in The Guardian,

I found out about this site from daily Kos to which I was referred by Warblogs:cc.

WarBlogs

I've added some of the better known Warblogs to the Iraq War News Page.

Chris Temple...

is with Jesus.

News on the War in Iraq

I built out a page that's dedicated to linking to United States and International news sources on the War in Iraq.

Baghdad Bloggers

No joke. See Bob Sullivan's Net Diaries Describe Baghdad Attack who writes about Salam Pax's and Bettejo Passalaqua's online blogs.

Deb Delgiacco

A friend of mine died Sunday 2 March after visiting her doctor with flu symptoms the previous day. She was a beautiful, beautiful woman inside and out. Bethany and I met her in 1999 in our neighborhood when as a 39 year old woman she had a teenager and a newborn. Her youngest daughter just turned 1 year old a couple of weeks ago. The Howard County Times ran a nice piece on Debi .

on Chris Temple

Some of you will remember my posting ab Chris Temple some mos ago. He's the new pastor fresh out of seminary who collapsed in his pulpit one Sunday. Turns out he has leukemia. His faithful friend, Amelia Hendricks sent this out on Sat. 8 March 2003:

As I e-mailed a couple of weeks ago, Chris has not been feeling well lately.
He announced to his congregation last Sunday, after delivering the
message, that his leukemia is back (out of remission). Chris and Roberta
have decided not to go through chemotherapy again and just to receive
supportive therapy. Supportive therapy means some medications, transfusions
of blood products as needed, and the like. He is not in any pain, but he is
very weak. They are praying for God's healing, of course, but don't know if
God will answer by healing Chris here or in heaven.

Chris is still able to carry out parts of his role as shepherd of the
Ligonier flock. He plans to keep preaching every other Sunday as he is
able.

Thank you for your prayers for him, his family and his church. I will
include his address at the bottom of the e-mail if you want to send them a
card.

Chris and Roberta Temple
324 W. Vincent St
Ligonier, PA 15658

The Real Deal About Chemical, Nuclear & Biological Warfare

A couple of days ago, a friend sent me an email supposedly from SFC Red Thomas (Ret), Armor Master Gunner, Mesa, AZ entitled A Soldier's Viewpoint on Surviving Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Attacks. I used to get these kinds of emails all the time (less now for some reason) and so my first instinct was to find out if this were a hoax. And so I checked my favorite Urban Legends site and found out that not only was the email substantially what it said it was but that there was some good information in it as well (though there are some dissents).

I offer it here as a public service!

Dealing with Arab Rage

I was reading Arab Friends Turn Away from the US and it reminded me of something I had posted not long after 9/11.

The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt

I just finished reading Edmund Morris' wonderful The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt, which was originally published in 1979 and won a Pulitzer. It hit my radar screen when some weeks ago I decided to join the History Book Club and choose Morris' Theodore Rex as one of my selections. After I began reading and enjoying it, I discovered that it was the second in a projected three volume series that Morris began on TR two decades ago. So I set Rex down and purchased vol 1 and drank it in. It's wonderful and now I'm a bona fide TR fan. This man was incredible. Here's a quote from Theodore Rex that quickly summarizes TR's life in terms of accomplisments:

"He had been a published author at eighteen, a husband at twenty-two, an acclaimed historian and New York State Assemblyman at twenty-three, a father and a widower at twenty-five [TR lost his first wife and mom on the same day just after his first daughter Alice was born], a ranchman at twenty-six, a candidate for Mayor of New York at twenty-seven, a husband again at twenty-eight, a Civil Service Commissioner of the United States at thirty [appointed by the President]. ...Police Commissioner of New York City at thirty-six, Assistant Secretary of the Navy at thirty-eight, Colonel of the First US Volunteer Calvary, the "Rough Riders," at thirty-nine."

TR went on to become Governor of New York at age forty, then Vice-President and then an assasin's bullet made him the youngest President ever at age forty-two (Kennedy was the youngest person *elected* President at forty-three; Clinton was forty-five when we became president).

TR spoke German and French, attended Harvard. He was an amateur boxer, a policeman, started a finance club, a stockmen's association and an extremely influential hunting-conservation society (connected with the start of both the National Zoo and of Yellowstone National Park). He climbed the Matterhorn and "became a world authority on North American mammals."

TR wrote 38 books, including his first book, The Naval War of 1812, which he published when he was 23 years old. It was instantly considered by both England and America as the definitive work on the subject and within five or six years the US govt established a requirement that every US Navy ship have at least one copy on board. Morris adds,

"Eleven years later, when Great Britain was preparing her own official history of the Royal Navy, the editors paid Theodore the unprecedented compliment of asking him to write the section of that work dealing with the War of 1812" (p. 136).

I loved this book and found much to admire in TR.

Two things stood out to me: 1) his activism. TR was a doer. He made things happen. 2) his joie d'vivre. One contemporary said, "The important thing to remember about TR is that he's about six years old." His favorite exclamation was "Deeeelighted." He was a commendably optimistic individual.

I recommend this book and his life as worthy of study. I'm now rejoining Theodore Rex and dreading finishing it already.

Kevin Miller Responds

Kevin A Miller responds to the "firestorm" created by Nomo Pomo—a Postmodern Rant
Why we can and should talk about something else. We blogged on it on 16 Feb and also participated in a recent Next-Wave article.

Google buys Pyra, creater of Blogger Software!

See here.

Nomo Pomo?

a response to

Nomo Pomo—a Postmodern Rant
Why we can and should talk about something else.

by Kevin A. Miller

Kevin Miller has grown a bit fatigued with evangelicals' fascination and interaction with postmodernism. Yet he apparently stills sees value in the movement as evidenced by his willing participation in this month's Emergent Convention. His critique of the burgeoning emerging church movement has precipitated lots of keytapping in pomoChristianLand. (See, for example, comments by Next-Wave publisher Charlie Wave, iphy, Andrew Jones, and a number of posts by Andrew Carega, etc.)

First of all, I think it worth noting that Miller has styled his comment as a "rant." A rant, by the nature of the case, is meant to be taken as somewhat iconoclastic. It's a dramatized, emotional overstatement for the purpose of effect. One does not ever take a rant to be a "reasoned critique, pro and con." Rather it's the verbal equivalent of a molotov cocktail. Yet the dissonance that results from applying such a metaphor to Miller's expression reveals that it really would be more accurate to characterize his tone as "rantesque." He moderates his criticism with some positive comments about ideas drifting out beyond the bounds of the pomoChristian thoughtspace into the general evangelical atmosphere. So while we will disagree with some of his comments, let's be fair and recognize that he's raising his voice (and his rhetoric) to make a point.

So what of his specific comments?

Miller says,

"It's hard to remember now, but a decade ago, seminars were given on preaching, not on "Preaching in a Postmodern Age." Books were written on plain ol' youth ministry, not "Postmodern Youth Ministry." Of course, we were all unenlightened, unwashed then, locked in a dead, Newtonian modernism."

Miller's sarcasm serves to make the point that pre-postmodern ministry (if you'll allow the phrase) can't be absolutized as uniformly modern. To collapse the "pre-postmodern" Christian pastor to being "merely" a modern is as patently unfair as accusing every emerging church leader as subscribing to every concept advocated by Derrida, Foucault, Rorty, and the rest of the gang.

After expressing agreement with some points made by PPMs (proponents of postmodern ministry), Miller launches into his major points of concern:

"On other topics, I agree to a point. PPMs have called for metaphor, narrative, and surprise in preaching; after all, Jesus taught in parables. Good reminder. But the same Testament that gives us the elliptical parables gives us the straightforward exposition of Peter in Acts 2 and the dense argumentation of Paul in Romans 9-11, not to mention the name-by-name genealogies of Matthew and the linear history of Acts. Let us recapture indirection but not canonize it."

I think this may be a bit of a straw man. Are most PPMs advocating a wholesale abandonment of treating the Scripture's significant didactic passages?

Miller continues:

"PPMs want us to listen to the postmodernizing culture, to enter relationship and accept our common brokenness. Who would argue? But while we love the relativist, let us hate the relativism. It puzzles me why postmodern theory has drawn such praise from Christians, when its essence (beneath the turgid prose) is that there is no objective truth. The "rules" of science or morality, pomo scholars contend, are as arbitrary as the rules of baseball. "


This criticism cuts both ways, I'm afraid. While Miller is rendered confused by Christians learning from those who eschew objective truth, the emerging church movement is equally baffled by those who believe Christian ministry is merely a matter of putting in place the right organizational system and procedures and that Christian theology is perfectly expressed by a pristine cathedral of propositional truths. And if Miller were to object, "Hey, that's unfair; we don't all believe that!" I would (wholeheartedly) agree and counter that just as the pastor laboring in modernity doesn't necessarily subscribe to a tepid, two-dimensional Cartesian epistemology, so also the youth leader who's been jazzed by Stanley Grenz and Brian McLaren doesn't necessarily believe Christian ministry and thought is all chaos and spontaneity.

Miller comments,

"But as Dinesh D'Souza reminds us, "Postmodern theory suffers from the weakness that the postmodernists themselves don't believe it." When they get sick, they check into a modernist hospital, and when they fly, they step onto a plane built by engineers whose work must not be as random as the postmodernists claimed.""

I've now read or heard the self-referential incoherency argument (think Spock telling the robot "I cannot tell a lie" and smoke coming out the back of the machine's head) so many times that I've taken to writing SRI in the margin of whatever book I'm reading. This is a valid critique of those postmodern theorists who deny the ability to know and/or communicate, but only of those. And I've heard Brian McLaren make exactly the same point as Miller about desiring modern brain surgeons and airline pilots.

Miller goes on,

"We're told that "the world you and I were prepared to lead and minister in is over." But modernism is proving to be a hardy old guy who doesn't quite die, no matter how many obituaries are written. Just as pre-modern witchcraft and superstition flourished during and after the Enlightenment, so will modernist approaches survive into a postmodern world. Indeed, modernism will remain powerful (though interacting with postmodern ideas), since we live in what Jeremy Rifkin dubbed the Biotech Century."

He's right.

Miller continues,

"Until recently, PPMs have overlooked (or sometimes, delighted in) the fact that, as J. I. Packer writes, postmodernism is parasitical: it lives off the achievements and failures of modernism but offers nothing positive of its own. Its only construction is deconstruction. True, some edifices need to be demolished, but architectural awards are not given to wrecking crews."

While I have a very high respect for Packer, I'm uncomfortable with Miller's implied summary dismissal here for a couple of reasons. First, Miller is seemingly collapsing PPMs down to pomo theory. PPMs don't see postmodernism as "the answer." Jesus Christ is the answer and most if not all PPMs know this. Secondly, Christians in the emerging church movement are being constructive. There is a burst of international activity, for example, where Christians are seeking out-of-the-box ways to express their love and devotion of God through creative corporate worship. In many quarters, the emerging church movement is moving beyond its initial deconstructive phase. Surely some are stuck there but not all.

Miller adds,

"I'm fully prepared to admit that when we boomers were young, we faddishly embraced church-growth ratios and sociological analysis; we praised these modern tools as the salvation of the church. So it's poetic justice for us now to sit in the back of the room, the balding and befuddled, as the next generation praises the postmodern matrix as the salvation of the church.

But we're both wrong. We've already got a salvation for the church, and he will not share his glory with any current cultural form, no matter how valuable or necessary it may be. If the church uncritically embraced modern culture, the solution is not to uncritically embrace postmodern culture."

Bingo. On the money. Best two paragraphs of the article.

And on that point of agreement, I'll end!

Thanks Jordon

Jordon Cooper has brought our attention to the plight of Jacqueline Saburido.

More on Brian's Sermon

Brian kindly gave me permission to publish is Sermon to President Bush on faithmaps.org. There are also links there to the audio and video version of this message that Brian gave on 12 January.

Brian McLaren's Sermon for President Bush

I everyone; it's been a while! This is worth reading.